Legal Opinion

Hill v. Rice

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1987No. 86-168PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves the question of whether a majority of the lot owners in a residential subdivision could remove the restrictive covenants which had been imposed upon the lots when the subdivision was initially platted. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the lot owner who was alleged to be in violation of the restrictive covenants, and the plaintiff appealed. We affirm.

Appellant Richard O. Hill commenced this action in the Circuit Court of Autauga County, seeking a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction against W. C. Rice prohibiting him from violating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Springdale Gayfer's Store Co. v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Reetz v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Tubbs v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scholten v. Blackhawk PartnersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Bon Aventure, L.L.C. v. Craig Dyas L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Heltman v. CatanachNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Rice v. COHOLANCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Smith v. First Sav. of Louisiana, FSASupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API