State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Defendant appeals his murder conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the confession that he gave to police officers, because his confession was involuntary. The state contends that the conviction must be affirmed, because at trial defendant took the stand and admitted that he committed the murder for which he was charged and, consequently, has waived any right to object to the admission of his earlier confession. We agree with the state and affirm on that basis, expressing no opinion on the matter of the voluntariness of the confession.
Defendant was interviewed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. UnsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. McKendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SparksOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Sanderson v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.