Sanderson v. Mark

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment, following a jury trial, in a medical malpractice action arising out of defendant’s 1 alleged misdiagnosis and related failure to treat plaintiffs breast cancer. Plaintiff assigns error, inter alia, to the trial court’s evidentiary rulings that culminated in the exclusion of the testimony of plaintiffs expert witness, Dr. James Gallant. We conclude that, on the totality of the record, any error in the predicate rulings and in the ultimate exclusion of Gallant’s testimony was harmless. Plaintiffs other assignments of error lack merit. Accordingly, we…