Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. VanVleck

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 2016No. D069893; D069894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

—These consolidated appeals raise the issue of whether Vehicle Code section 23640 (section 23640) prohibits military diversion pursuant to Penal Code section 1001.80 (military diversion statute) for defendants charged with driving under the influence offenses. We conclude military diversion is not available for defendants charged with driving under the influence offenses in violation of sections 23152 and 23153.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The People charged Kyle Warren VanVleck with misdemeanor violations of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving while…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Department of Public Health v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wade v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Hopkins v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Appellate DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Grassi v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Moore v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Byrd CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API