Legal Opinion
Geremia v. Boyarsky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1928PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The defendants are carpenters and building contractors, and in April, 1926, the plaintiff requested them to submit bids for the carpenter work and painting for a house that he was building for himself. The defendants met in the evening of April 25th for the purpose of making their estimates, but did not complete their figures owing to the lateness of the hour. They wrote their estimates on two separate pieces of paper but did not add the figures. The next morning the plaintiff called upon the defendants and requested the defendant Boyarsky to stop the work that he was upon and complete the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Board of School Commissioners v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.