Legal Opinion

Porter v. Hopkins

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tne Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought on an undertaking for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

By the undertaking in suit the defendants undertook to pay such damages as might be sustained by reason of the issuance of an injunction, if it should be finally decided by the court that the parties in whose behalf the writ was issued were not entitled to it.

The writ was issued out of one of the late District Courts of the city and county of San Francisco in a suit in equity brought by Egbert Judson et al. against George K. Porter et al. to perpetually enjoin the latter from prosecuting certain actions at law then pending for the recovery of some real estate which was then in controversy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bustamente v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Willson v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Leese v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Prader v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Fowler v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Donahue v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API