Legal Opinion

Lowenschuss v. Selnick (In re Lowenschuss)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1999No. 98-15292PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

Fred Lowenschuss (“Debtor”) appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s November 1, 1996 order: (1) ruling that the Fred Lowen-schuss & Associates at Law Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) was not ERISA qualified on the petition date, and was therefore not excluded from the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2); (2) ruling that Nevada law would be applied to determine whether Debtor’s interest in the Pension Plan was exempt from the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 522; and (3) granting Beverly Selnick’s (“Selnick”)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

Gill v. Stern (In re Stern)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
Drummond v. Urban (In Re Urban)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,920, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2649, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1918, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2457 in Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Fred Lowenschuss, Individually and in All Capacities, and Sun International North America, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Beverly Selnick, in Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Fred Lowenschuss v. Beverly SelnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
Donald v. Curry (In Re Donald)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
In Re StantonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.