State v. Morrow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Cueiam.
The evidence offered by defendant in support of his motion was insufficient to establish the prerequisites for granting a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence stated by Stacy, C.J., in the oft-cited case of S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81. Moreover, a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. S. v. Williams, 244 N.C. 459, 94 S.E. 2d 374; S. v. Dixon, 259 N.C. 249, 130 S.E. 2d 333. The findings of fact are amply supported by the evidence. As stated by Judge Martin, the testimony…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. NickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.