Legal Opinion

Mabey v. Howard & Lewis Motor Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 18, 1942No. 3788PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit for patent infringement presents the question whether the application of a skeleton frame to prevent horizontal or vertical movement of a battery in an over-size container involves invention. The District Court held the patent invalid (O’Brien v. Howard & Lewis Motor Sales, Inc., 1941, 42 F.Supp. 329), and plaintiffs appealed.

Appellants are the patentee under U. S. Patent No. 1,677,789, granted on July 17, 1928 and his assignee of a part interest. The charge of infringement is based upon sales by appellee of Ford motor cars alleged to have contained an infringing device. It was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1949
  2. Otto v. Koppers Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1956
  3. Turini v. Allens Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1951
  4. Winthrop-Atkins Co. v. CrossDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API