Legal Opinion

In re Lundberg

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 14, 1958No. 6330PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 to 5, inclusive, which are the only claims of appellant’s application for a patent on a flow control valve.

Claims 1 and 5 are representative and read:

1. A flow-control valve comprising a valve body having a flow passage through it and a cylindrical chamber formed transversely across it, and a rectangular plate valve member disposed diametrically in and roekable about the axis of said chamber, the flow-obstructing portions of the cylindrical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re PollackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Paul Chu, William Downs, John B. Doyle and Peter v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. In re DaviesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. In re HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Application of Bernard L. ZenitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of Habet M. KhelghatianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API