Legal Opinion
In Re Paul Chu, William Downs, John B. Doyle and Peter v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 14, 1995No. 95-1038PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
Paul Chu, William Downs, John B. Doyle, and Peter V. Smith (collectively Chu) appeal the August 9, 1994 decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) affirming the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 12, and 14 of patent application Serial No. 07/593,546 (the ’546 application). 1 We reverse.
I. Background
A. The Invention
Chu’s invention relates to an apparatus used to control emissions, such as sulfur oxides (SOx), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and particulates, such as fly ash, from fossil fuel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Donaldson Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. The Upjohn Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and McNeil Inc. And Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Vectra Fitness, Inc. v. Tnwk Corporation (Formerly Known as Pacific Fitness Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- In Re NTP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.