In re Pollack
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting all of appellants’ claims, 21 to 27, inclusive, for a patent alleging “new and useful improvements in Impregnated Fibrous Product.”
Appellants have moved in their brief to withdraw the appeal with respect to claim 28, which motion will be granted.
The appealed claims were rejected on the following references:
Baird et al., 2,133,183, October 11, 1938.
Shand et al., 2,209,850, July 30,1940.
*1157Palm et al., 2,219,054, October 22,1940.
Rothrock,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re SwainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re RobertsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- In re RossiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Kurt Hugo Folke LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Matter of the Application of Irving RossiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957