Legal Opinion
Bassett v. Rose
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1954PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.
This is a taxpayer’s suit brought against the town of Milford and its acting tax collector. The action was started to test the constitutionality of § 3 of the 1951 Special Act, No. 175, entitled “An Act Changing the Fiscal Year for the Town of Milford.” 26 Spec. Laws 137.
The finding establishes the following facts: The plaintiff is, and was at all the times mentioned, the owner of real property subject to taxation in the town of Milford. The defendant Jessie Rose is the duly appointed acting tax collector in the town. There has been a great increase in the number of dwellings in Milford since…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review of the Town of MiddleburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Miller v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- 84 Century Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.