Legal Opinion
Ross v. British Yukon Navigation Co., Ltd. Ross v. British Yukon Navigation Co., Ltd
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1951No. 12543_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, District Judge.
Two separate actions were brought by appellants, plaintiffs below, against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries and for damage to property resulting from a collision which occurred on the Alcan Highway, Yukon Territory, Dominion of Canada, between a tanker truck owned by appellee and alleged to have been driven negligently by its agent, Balfour Keenan, and an automobile driven by appellant Herman H. Ross, in which appellant Martha Cornelia Ross, his wife, was riding. Appellee cross-claimed against Herman H. Ross for damage to the truck. In addition to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Opple v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association and Robert G. Litolff v. William HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- P. W. Siebrand & Hiko Siebrand, Doing Business as Siebrand Bros., Circus and Carnival v. George F. Gossnell and Estella Gossnell, S. J. Carroll v. George F. Gossnell and Estella GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956