Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Howard's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Olay

Affirming.

Alliean Howard, as administratrix of E. C. Howard, brought this suit under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act (45 USCA, seos. 51-59) against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company to recover damages for his death. Prom a verdict and judgment in her favor for $8,500, this appeal is prosecuted.

The facts are these: Near the eastern end of the city of Ashland the railway company maintains a yard which is used for the -switching, storage, and repair of cars. The east-bound track is on the southern side of the yard, while the west-bound track is on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KoenneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. L N. R. R. Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nashville, C., & St. L. Ry. Co. v. CleaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Noble's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Chapman's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API