Legal Opinion
Roston v. Folsom
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs and the defendant move for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The action was brought by the plaintiffs, the alleged children of a deceased wage earner, for a review of the decision of the Federal Social Security Administrator, denying their application for children’s insurance benefits, as provided by the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g).
The facts herein are not in dispute. It appears that the wage earner, Meldrim Roston, married Ottolie Blaney on November 21, 1922, that they…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Kaufman v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Claim of Bell v. Terry & Tench Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Earle v. EarleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Andler v. AndlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Graby v. GrabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Nestor v. FolsomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- Polotti ex rel. Polotti v. FolsomDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
- De Soucey v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.