Claim of Bell v. Terry & Tench Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Certification by the State Industrial Commission of a question to the Appellate Division, Third Department, pursuant to section 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 622).
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The State Industrial Commission submits to this court the question: “ Are Albert Bell, son, Dorothy Bell and Marie Bell, daughters of Joseph K. Bell, deceased, dependent children of the said Joseph K. Bell, within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and entitled to the death benefits provided for by said law for dependent children ?”
There is no question here that Joseph K. Bell was killed on August 13, 1914, under circumstances entitling his widow and children under the age of eighteen years to death benefits under the provisions of the statute. But it is established…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Estate of MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Perkins v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Veazey v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Irvine v. . New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Baylis v. . BaylisNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Scott v. Independent Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Gritta's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Bailey v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Hiser v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.