Legal Opinion

De Soucey v. Flemming

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

In this action by the above-entitled infants, the plaintiffs seek to set aside the decision of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and to secure an adjudication that such plaintiffs are entitled to “child’s insurance benefits” under the Social Security Act, particularly Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 416(h)(1).

The parties to the suit have made cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. The record of the administrative proceedings has been incorporated in the government’s answer.

Facts

The plaintiffs are children of the insured wage earner, Edward F. De Soucey, who died…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Magner v. HobbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Bloch v. EwingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Roston v. FolsomDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
  4. In re the Estate of O'NeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  5. In Re the Estate of MontyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API