Legal Opinion

Hood v. Sioux Steel Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1939No. File No. 8255PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover certain commissions which he alleges are due him from the defendant. The material facts are undisputed and are, as follows: Plaintiff commenced his work for the defendant during the year 1934. In 1935 the parties entered into a written contract. Under this contract it was agreed that plaintiff should act as a salesman for the defendant and spend his entire time at such work. Plaintiff was working upon a commission basis. The contract provides in Paragraph Two: “In consideration of the entire time of the Party of the First Part (plaintiff) being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehman v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Conner v. Union Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Evans v. Hughes CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. StringhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. C. & J. Michel Brewing Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers Elevator Co. of Elk Point v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kane v. SchnitzlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jones v. Sully Buttes SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  5. Lambert v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API