Legal Opinion
Lockert v. Breedlove
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 5, 1987No. 182A87PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The sole issue before us is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss this action due to lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Billie E. Breedlove. We conclude that the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant Breedlove pursuant to N.C.G.S. § l-75.4(l)(a). Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The trial court’s findings of fact which are determinative of the single issue before us on appeal are uncontested. The plaintiff, Charles R. Lockert, a resident of Rowan County, North…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cariaga v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Nutri-West v. GibsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- In re Nhan Thi Thanh LeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1995
- Schall v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.