Legal Opinion

Schall v. Jennings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1990No. 8921SC1003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order denying his Rule 59 motion for a new trial.

This is the second appearance of this case on our docket. In the first visit the defendant appealed the trial court’s grant of its own new trial motion without allowing the parties to be heard. Schall v. Jennings, 94 N.C. App. 601, 381 S.E.2d 353 (1989) (unpublished opinion). The facts of this case, as ably articulated in the first appeal are as follows:

In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that he loaned defendant $20,000 in 1981. Defendant was then married to plaintiff’s daughter; however,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Harris v. PembaurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Lockert v. BreedloveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Musarra v. BockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API