Legal Opinion

Hodesh v. Korelitz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. 2008-1133PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The sole legal issue in this case is whether an agreement between appellant, Michael Hodesh, and one of the defendants in Hodesh’s medical-malpractice action, Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati, should have been disclosed to the jury. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not requiring disclosure of the agreement.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Michael Hodesh filed a medical-malpractice action against appellee Dr. Joel Korelitz and the Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati, among others, alleging that Korelitz and the hospital staff had left…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hamilton Insurance Services, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barton v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Barton v. Dep't of Transp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API