Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 18, 2013No. Nos. 66527-8-I; 66820-0-IPublished

1DissentSchindler, J.

¶77 (dissenting) I respectfully disagree with the conclusion that the secret agreement between the *940plaintiffs and one of the codefendants to enter into a covenant not to execute and release did not result in prejudice to defendant City First Mortgage Services LLC that warrants a new trial. The undisclosed agreement distorted the interests and alignment of the parties and created a sham of adversity that is contrary to Washington law, the right to a fair trial, the integrity of the adversary system, candor to the tribunal, and the administration of justice. Consistent with the requirements of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API