Collings v. City First Mortgage Services, LLC
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentSchindler, J.
¶77 (dissenting) I respectfully disagree with the conclusion that the secret agreement between the *940plaintiffs and one of the codefendants to enter into a covenant not to execute and release did not result in prejudice to defendant City First Mortgage Services LLC that warrants a new trial. The undisclosed agreement distorted the interests and alignment of the parties and created a sham of adversity that is contrary to Washington law, the right to a fair trial, the integrity of the adversary system, candor to the tribunal, and the administration of justice. Consistent with the requirements of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.