Legal Opinion

Schlesselman v. Gouge

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 31, 1967No. 21659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

This is a medical malpractice suit brought by Marvin Schlesselman and his wife, Sarah Schlesselman, against ■Dr. Ruth Gouge. The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as the plaintiffs or as Marvin and Sarah, and the defendant in error will be referred to- as the defendant.

The plaintiffs sought damages allegedly sustained by them as a result of the negligence of the defendant in diagnosing and treating Sarah. Trial was to a jury, which returned a general verdict for the defendant. The plaintiffs brought error from the judgment entered on that verdict.

The basic facts surrounding this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Newbury v. VogelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Spears Free Clinic & Hospital for Poor Children v. MaierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Brown v. HughesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schuessler v. WolterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Smith v. CurranColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Leaf v. BeihofferColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. FERKINS v. Flatiron Structures Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API