Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1992No. B059040PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this case we hold that when one of two or more tortfeasors satisfies a judgment entered jointly against both, and without apportionment of fault between them, such tortfeasor is entitled to seek statutory contribution even though a claim for equitable indemnity had been previously denied.

Lucky Stores, Inc. (Lucky) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company (Coca-Cola) on the latter’s complaint for contribution arising from Coca-Cola’s satisfaction of a tort judgment previously entered against both companies in an underlying action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Nakash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Baldwin v. Kilpatrick (In Re Baldwin)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Monastra v. Konica Business MacHines, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Eott Energy Corp. v. Storebrand International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API