Legal Opinion

Bufano v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1965No. Civ. 21982PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

On February 1, 1962, plaintiff filed this action against the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter referred to as City) for the conversion of two granite sculptures. The City alleged that his action was barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 335, 338) as the conversion occurred in 1942 when the City acquired the sculptures. After a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, the trial court granted the City’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and denied its motion for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the City…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. City of Stockton v. VoteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Newhart v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API