Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:
Fritz, J.
On this appeal the village of West Milwaukee and the county of Milwaukee contend that neither of them *31is liable for workmen’s compensation under ch. 102, Stats., for the death of Robert Yunker. Yunker, who was a resident of West Milwaukee, in Milwaukee county, had received relief and support for himself and his family from Milwaukee county under ch. 49, Stats., from October, 1932, until he died in August, 1933. As that county had adopted the county system of poor relief in accordance with sec. 49.15, Stats., it was obliged, under ch. 49,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Zoulalian v. New England Sanatorium & Benevolent Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Thurston Co. Chap. Amer. Etc. v. Dept. L. I.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Thurston County Chapter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marathon County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Bituminous Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Davenport v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Borneman v. Corwyn Transport, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Oswalt v. Lucas CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.