Legal Opinion
Novinger v. E. I. DuPont deNemours & Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1981No. Civ. No. 79-1188PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
A motion to dismiss a third party complaint is before the court. Third-party defendant Deutsche Akzo Coatings GmbH (DAC),1 a German manufacturer of automobile repair products, asserts that this court lacks jurisdiction over it and that the third-party complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Plaintiffs sued several defendants who are in some way involved with auto body work. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Kevin Novinger alleges that his contact with certain products used to finish automobiles caused permanent severe…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seiler v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni AgustaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Jones v. Halstead Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Savin Corp. v. Heritage Copy Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bike v. American Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.