Legal Opinion

Vincent v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Bill by Edward B. Vincent against tbe city of Kalamazoo to restrain interference with the erection of a building. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

On July 35, 1894, James Carrol conveyed to the complainant, by warranty deed, the following parcel of land in the city of Kalamazoo, viz.:

“That part of lot number 333 commencing 36J feet from the south curbstone, the same being 31 feet from the center, of Water street; * * * running thence east 66 feet; thence north 36& feet; thence west 66 feet; thence south to place of beginning,—and containing the land therein, except that set apart for sidewalk purposes.”

*231Previous to this time, and from 1864 to 1893, when the building was destroyed by fire, the curbstone was distant 10 feet from the side…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. BrushaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Reynolds v. GaertnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Weber v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Merritt v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Abbott v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API