Abbott v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I cannot accept either the result reached by the majority or its premises. I do not believe that it is appropriate to apply “center of the right-of-way” presumptions in this case. Furthermore, I cannot see how either “ownership of a narrow and inaccessible strip of an abandoned railroad right-of-way” or “a narrow strip which could hardly be of use or value except to the owner of the adjoining land” is involved.
In 1881, Isaac and Mag. J. Taylor conveyed to the predecessor of appellee St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company a tract of land. The granting clause read:...do hereby grant, bargain,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ashcroft v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.