Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Halloran

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1968No. 53120PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Justice.

This suit is one for personal injuries arising from an automobile collision. There was a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $250. Under the peculiar circumstances presented, we are not concerned with the facts or the evidence. Our controversy begins with the verdict. Since the claim was for $25,000, we have jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed a motion for new trial on several stated grounds. Defendant filed a motion “for a directed verdict,” in accordance with his trial motion or, in the alternative, for a new trial on liability only; the only ground thus stated for a new trial was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Edmisten v. DousetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Ruediger v. American Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Bishop v. CarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Schanz v. Estate of TerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MorrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Rodman v. SchrimpfMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API