McCarthy v. Halloran
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
EAGER, Justice.
This suit is one for personal injuries arising from an automobile collision. There was a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $250. Under the peculiar circumstances presented, we are not concerned with the facts or the evidence. Our controversy begins with the verdict. Since the claim was for $25,000, we have jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed a motion for new trial on several stated grounds. Defendant filed a motion “for a directed verdict,” in accordance with his trial motion or, in the alternative, for a new trial on liability only; the only ground thus stated for a new trial was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Edmisten v. DousetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Ruediger v. American Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dixon v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bishop v. CarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Schanz v. Estate of TerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MorrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Rodman v. SchrimpfMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.