Dixon v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Bi-State Development Agency was the beneficiary of a favorable jury verdict in a personal injury action. The trial court, however, by amended order, granted plaintiff-respondent a new trial. Defendant appeals contending that the amended order is invalid because it was issued without notice and that the original order states no valid ground for an award of a new trial. Defendant’s contention is correct, and we reverse the judgment.
Plaintiff injured her leg when defendant’s bus in which she was a passenger came to a sudden stop throwing another passenger against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Caldwell Paint Manufacturing Co. v. LeBeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pruneau v. SmiljanichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Marriage of Hightower v. HightowerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hewitt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hiers v. LemleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Champ v. PoelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Kairuz v. RominesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Brockhoff v. LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.