Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1982No. 44362PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Bi-State Development Agency was the beneficiary of a favorable jury verdict in a personal injury action. The trial court, however, by amended order, granted plaintiff-respondent a new trial. Defendant appeals contending that the amended order is invalid because it was issued without notice and that the original order states no valid ground for an award of a new trial. Defendant’s contention is correct, and we reverse the judgment.

Plaintiff injured her leg when defendant’s bus in which she was a passenger came to a sudden stop throwing another passenger against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Caldwell Paint Manufacturing Co. v. LeBeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Pruneau v. SmiljanichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Marriage of Hightower v. HightowerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hewitt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hiers v. LemleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Champ v. PoelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Kairuz v. RominesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Brockhoff v. LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API