Legal Opinion

Edmisten v. Dousette

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1960No. 7788PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Presiding Judge.

Intertwined in this hurrah’s nest of litigation are (a) the claim of plaintiff, J. E. Edmisten, in the sum of $99.67 for old lumber from a razed barn which was furnished to defendants, Ralph A. and Hillary Dousette, who are husband and wife, and (b) defendants’ counterclaim in two counts. In the first count, defendants charged that plaintiff “was indebted” to them (1) for four items having an aggregate “value” of $34.70 (including a linoleum floor cover at $9.60, sand and gravel at $7.10, paint and wallpaper at $15, and a toilet flange at $3), to which items we…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Goodman v. Allen Cab Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Welch v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Millar v. BergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Stanziale v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Fellows v. FarmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Bunch v. CraderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. P____ D v. C____ SMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API