Legal Opinion

Austin v. Seligman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 5, 1883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

'Demurrer to Complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The complaint demurred to alleges that some time prior to April 15,1883, the plaintiff delivered to the firm of Kempt & Co. certain jeweler’s sweepings, to be refined, of the value of $4,292, ■and agreed to pay that firm for refining the sweepings the sum of $320; that by the terms of the agreement between them the sweepings were to be refined, “and the product thereof delivered to or accounted for, and the value thereof, less the agreed price for refining the same, paid to the plaintiff within 20 days from the delivery thereof.” The complaint further alleges that on the thirtieth day of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Hendrick v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Garnsey v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Federal Surety Co. v. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. PratherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API