Legal Opinion
Federal Surety Co. v. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1927No. 7406PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
The Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Company, a corporation (hereinafter called the Minneapolis Company), brought this action against the Federal Surety Company (hereinafter called the Surety Company) to recover upon a bond which the Surety Company executed as surety for H. N. Buell, doing business under the name of Buell Bridge Company, the contractor, under a construction contract entered into with the highway commission of the state of Montana.
Chapter 139, Revised Codes of Montana, 1921, § § 1783 to 1802, inclusive, provides for a state highway commission to consist…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nancy Huisha-Huisha v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Capital Fire Ins. Co. of California v. LanghorneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Gray v. BlightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. File Bros. Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.