Legal Opinion

Fulmer v. Skelly Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1936No. 32,451PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was an action by the owner of a quarter section of land in Butler county against a number of oil companies to recover permanent damages occasioned to his farm by reason of the pollution of Turkey creek, which runs through his farm and supplies it, its occupants and livestock with drinking water and other natural uses and benefits.

The petition alleges that the defendant companies have been engaged in drilling for and producing, marketing and storing oil and gas on land owned or leased by them and situated on the east side of Turkey…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Parker v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Berry v. Shell Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. McMullen v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  3. Edmund Maher and Zelora Maher v. Cities Service Pipe Line Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Seglem v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Peterson v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API