Legal Opinion

Seglem v. Skelly Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1937No. 32,749PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*217The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This is another damage suit for the pollution of a stream caused by salt water and noxious refuse from an oil field.

Defendants are corporations which during the past twenty years have developed a considerable oil field bordering on Turkey creek and its tributaries in Butler county.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a farm which they inherited from their father, who died in 1931.. It is situated on Turkey creek' downstream from defendants’ oil field, from which salt water, oil and noxious refuse have found their way into Turkey creek and its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Jeakins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Elder v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. McMullen v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API