Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Hagee
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. 11-2215 (RWR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Pro se plaintiff Rory M. Walsh moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 for reconsideration of the December 4, 2013 memorandum opinion and order denying Walsh’s motion for reconsideration of the October 26, 2012 memorandum opinion and order, which granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss. Walsh argues that there is a change in controlling law and reasserts legal arguments previously raised and rejected. Because Walsh has not established that he is entitled to relief from the judgment under Rule 59, his motion will be denied.
The relevant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLaughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Kittner v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Jung v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Wright v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Habliston v. Finra Dispute Resolution, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Davenport v. DjourabchiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Chien v. MorrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Chien v. RansomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Clean Label Project Foundation v. Garden of Life, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022