In re a Subpoena Duces Tecum
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
The district attorney for the northwestern district (district attorney) filed, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, a petition for relief with a single justice of this court from the decision of a Superior Court judge denying the district attorney’s motion to quash the subpoena of John and Tom Doe (plaintiffs), requesting copies of their videotaped interviews conducted during the course of a now concluded criminal investigation concerning *686their allegations of sexual abuse by fellow students at the elementary school. A single justice of this court reserved and reported the issue whether, “[ajssuming…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Julius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Bougas v. Chief of Police of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Hastings & Sons Publishing v. City Treasurer of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mitchell v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Champa v. Weston Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Georgiou v. Commissioner of Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.