Legal Opinion

In re a Subpoena Duces Tecum

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 2006PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The district attorney for the northwestern district (district attorney) filed, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, a petition for relief with a single justice of this court from the decision of a Superior Court judge denying the district attorney’s motion to quash the subpoena of John and Tom Doe (plaintiffs), requesting copies of their videotaped interviews conducted during the course of a now concluded criminal investigation concerning *686their allegations of sexual abuse by fellow students at the elementary school. A single justice of this court reserved and reported the issue whether, “[ajssuming…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Julius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Bougas v. Chief of Police of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Hastings & Sons Publishing v. City Treasurer of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Mitchell v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  4. Champa v. Weston Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Georgiou v. Commissioner of Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API