Legal Opinion
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Miller
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 19, 1952No. Civ. 103-51PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, Chief Judge.
This is an action for specific performance oif an option contract for the purchase of certain real estate. Pursuant to Rule 56 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the plaintiff 'has moved for a summary judgment in its favor. The pleadings and certain admissions of the defendants, deemed to be admissions by reason of defendants’ failure to respond to plaintiff’s request for admissions (File No. 8) within the time required, Rule 36(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., disclose that there is no genuine issue as to any of the following material.
Fa…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ebensberger v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Bennett v. MoonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Beard v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- O'Bryon v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Thriftway Medford Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Reuben Klein and Elaine D. Klein v. Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Haase v. RichmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. ZachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.