Legal Opinion

Migliaccio v. Smith Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court — Hon. James' A. Howe, Judge. Action for damages, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff. Upon his motion a new trial was ordered. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The Smith Fuel Company is a copartnership composed of W. I. and E. C. Smith and was engaged as retail dealers in fuel. On the morning of April 17, 1907, one Holmes, employed by Malloy, drove his team in front of the Des Moines Clay Manufacturing Company’s office,, tied the lines about the brake handle, and went into its office, about eighty feet distant, for orders. Shortly afterwards H. Gunson, who was in the employment of the Smith Fuel Company and driving one of its teams, drove up behind Holmes’ wagon, tied his lines to the brake handle, and went into the office for the same purpose.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Griggs v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Tathwell v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Douglass ex rel. Osborne v. AgneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parsons v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Ash v. Century Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Fulmele v. ForrestSuperior Court of Delaware · 1913
  4. Worez v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Gregory v. Kirkman Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API