Douglass ex rel. Osborne v. Agne
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar District Court.— Hon. W. N. Treich. lbr, Judge-. Action for damages alleged to have resulted from seduction. Verdict and judgment for defendant. The plain- tiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1. Appeal: notice. Appellee insists that the service of notice of appeal did not confer jurisdiction on this court, in that it was entitled as “ In the Supreme Court of Iowa,” and was not served on L. Osborne, the next friend. As the notice, when served, is to be filed with the cleric of the district court, save yvhen served on a co-party, doubtless it .should be entitled as in the district court. Sections 411V, 4115, Code. But as no particular form is required, even where headed, “ In the Supreme Court of Iowa,” it will be regarded as sufficient if it clearly indicates the court and judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Fulliam v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Bryson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Brown v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Clayton v. SievertsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Parsons v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Keller v. DoddsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- State v. NormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.