Legal Opinion

Collins v. International Dairy Queen

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided January 21, 1998No. 1:94-cr-00004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, District Judge.

Defendants have moved for a stay of these proceedings as to all members of Class III, consisting of all members of the permanent settlement class in the Poole Settlement Agreement, 1 and all persons claiming under them, who may have claims against defendants arising from that agreement.

On January 8, 1997, the court ruled that members of the Poole settlement class were entitled to receive notification of this class action whether or not their franchise agreements contain arbitration clauses. See Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc., 169 F.R.D. 690…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API