Protective Closures Co. v. Clover Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
The complaint herein charges patent infringement. The answer denies validity, and to it is added a counter-claim for a declaratory judgment of invalidity. A supplemental complaint charges unfair competition. In its answer, defendant denies acts of unfair competition and alleges that the supplemental complaint fails to state a good cause of action.
The plaintiffs are Joseph R. Grenier and Ernest W, Dormeyer, Jr., joint patentees, and Protective Closures Company, Inc., claimed to be a licensee. The defendant is Clover Industries, Inc.
The patent in suit is No. 2,580,-762. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Protective Closures Co., Inc., Joseph R. Grenier and Ernest W. Dormeyer, Jr. v. Clover Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Protective Closures Co., Inc., Joseph R. Grenier and Ernest W. Dormeyer, Jr. v. Clover Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968