Shoaf v. Frost.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil. ActioN by C. J. Shoaf & Co. against E. Erost, heard by Judge F. W. Timberlalce, at Eall Term, 1900, of Davie Superior Court. Erom judgment for plaintiffs, the ■deefndant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtOlakjk, J.
The defendant excepted to tbe homestead allotment on tbe grounds: (1) Tb'at tbe land allotted to him is found by tbe appraisers to be worth only $700. (2) Because the judgment under which the homestead is allotted bad been paid off before any return of homestead bad ever been made by the appraisers.
As to the first point, it was decided and settled in this case on the former appeal (123 N. C., 343), that, the jury having fixed the value of the whole tract at $2,000, the land should be divided into two tracts of equal value in the opinion of tire appraisers, with election to the homesteader to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- C. J. Shoaf & Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- C. J. Shoaf & Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Shoaf & Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Stokes v. . CogdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Blum v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Perry v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.