Legal Opinion
Rogers v. HOLMES
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
This is an appeal by William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, hereinafter called “the Custodian,” in a proceeding brought pursuant to ORS 120.130 to recover property which escheated to the State Land Board from the estate of Albert Reichel.
The defendants, Robert D. Holmes, Mark 0. Hatfield and Sigfrid Unander, respectively, Governor, Secretary of State and State Treasurer of the State of Oregon, together constitute the State Land Board of this state. We will hereinafter refer to them as “the State.”
The powers and duties of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Gas Service Company v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc. v. Missouri Highway Reciprocity CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State ex rel. Brady Motor-Frate, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.