James Griffith & Sons Co. v. Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. Two cases, one by Henry L. Brooks, the other by Howard C. By-land, both against the James Griffith & Sons Company, a corporation. Judgments for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
These two cases were by consent tried together in the court below. They were brought into this court upon separate records and heard and submitted as one cause, the evidence in both cases being the same except as to the injuries suffered by the defendants below, and the cases will be disposed of in one opinion. The plaintiff in error (hereinafter'called company) is a corporation doing business as a building' contractor, and the defendants in error (hereinafter called plaintiffs) were at the time in question in the employ of the company. The cases were for personal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Clark v. Union Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Channon v. Sanford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Deye v. Lodge & Shipley Mach. Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cash v. Casey-Hedges Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- American Shipbuilding Co. v. LorenskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Hartman v. Toyo Kisen Kaisha S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1917
- Raxworthy v. HeisenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915