Hartman v. Toyo Kisen Kaisha S. S. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
At Law. Action by A. L- Hartman against the Toyo Kisen Kaisha Steamship Company.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff while in defendant’s employment, through the negligence of those for whom it is claimed defendant is responsible. A jury was waived, and the action tried to the court.
*569Plaintiff at the time of the injury was employed as a barber on the Shiuyo Maru, one of defendant’s liners plying between Japanese and American ports, the vessel being on the particular occasion in the port of Nagasaki. At that port, where conditions are such that steamers do not lay at the bund or wharf, but…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- The BelfastSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The Hine v. TrevorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lemon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1946
- Williams v. SchaffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920