Legal Opinion

William A. Doe Co. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The writ in this case described the action as in tort or contract; the declaration was in. two counts, the first in tort, the second in contract. Afterwards, by amendment, the second count was struck out. The trial judge overruled the defendant’s demurrer to the first count and reported the case to this court.

After the amendment the action became one in tort for unliquidated damages for the alleged eviction of the plaintiff as lessee of stalls numbered 28, 30 and 32, and of cellars numbered 9 and 10, in the building called Faneuil Hall, a part of Faneuil Hall Market in the city of Boston.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Royce v. GuggenheimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Case v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Skally v. ShutsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Sherman v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Voss v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rome v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Tinkham v. WindMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. H. W. Robinson Carpet Co. v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Paeff v. Hawkins-Washington Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Cochrell v. HiattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API