Legal Opinion

Tinkham v. Wind

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1946PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff sues in tort for damages for an alleged wrongful entry by the defendant and deprivation of possession of premises leased from the defendant. The jury found for the plaintiff after the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict had been denied subject to her exception.

By a sealed instrument dated January 7, 1937, the defendant did “lease, demise and let.” to the plaintiff and her husband, since deceased, “a certain summer dwelling house and portable garage” with the surrounding lawn and flower gardens on the defendant’s property in Wareham “to hold for and during the term of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Headley v. HoopengarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lawrence v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Thompson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Markey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dryden Oil Company of New England, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Sarkesian v. Cedric Chase Photographic Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Coburn v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Murphy v. Brilliant Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Snow v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API